Comments on: SF Central Subway is slowest slow motion train wreck in history. http://kfarr.com/2007/11/18/sf-central-subway-is-slowest-slow-motion-train-wreck-in-history/ Kieran Farr Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:42:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: kfarr http://kfarr.com/2007/11/18/sf-central-subway-is-slowest-slow-motion-train-wreck-in-history/#comment-64 kfarr Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:18:14 +0000 http://kfarr.wordpress.com/2007/11/18/sf-central-subway-is-slowest-slow-motion-train-wreck-in-history/#comment-64 That is a cool site, Jay. I mashed together this map: http://maps.yahoo.com/mapmixer?lid=499502a0&pg=view Eric, thanks for the compliment on the image. I had fun making the graphic to vent my anger at MUNI. That is a cool site, Jay. I mashed together this map:
http://maps.yahoo.com/mapmixer?lid=499502a0&pg=view

Eric, thanks for the compliment on the image. I had fun making the graphic to vent my anger at MUNI.

]]> By: Jay http://kfarr.com/2007/11/18/sf-central-subway-is-slowest-slow-motion-train-wreck-in-history/#comment-57 Jay Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:46:40 +0000 http://kfarr.wordpress.com/2007/11/18/sf-central-subway-is-slowest-slow-motion-train-wreck-in-history/#comment-57 Check out <a href="http://maps.yahoo.com/mapmixer" rel="nofollow">MapMixer</a> for a way to integrate static maps into Yahoo Maps. It works really well. Check out MapMixer for a way to integrate static maps into Yahoo Maps. It works really well.

]]> By: Eric http://kfarr.com/2007/11/18/sf-central-subway-is-slowest-slow-motion-train-wreck-in-history/#comment-55 Eric Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:14:37 +0000 http://kfarr.wordpress.com/2007/11/18/sf-central-subway-is-slowest-slow-motion-train-wreck-in-history/#comment-55 Just saw the pingback -- thanks, I'm glad you enjoyed the posts. I don't know if you saw or not, but I finally just posted the 5th and last one (a bit delayed). I couldn't agree with you more on bumping Geary BRT up to the top of the list. If pure transit need was actually the motivation behind the Central Subway, then the whole project would be scrapped, and we'd be working on Geary instead. That image is brilliant, by the way. Just saw the pingback — thanks, I’m glad you enjoyed the posts. I don’t know if you saw or not, but I finally just posted the 5th and last one (a bit delayed). I couldn’t agree with you more on bumping Geary BRT up to the top of the list. If pure transit need was actually the motivation behind the Central Subway, then the whole project would be scrapped, and we’d be working on Geary instead.

That image is brilliant, by the way.

]]>