
Editor and Publisher says newspapers no longer hold relevance in end-user’s daily lives.
TRUE.
Newspapers cling to their old function as news reporters, but end-users want more. They want to hear about events that affect their lives and their communities instead of tired old stories about shootings, local politics and sports.
For consumers, it must no longer just present news and information, but become the first choice for customers and non-customers alike “to help me know or do whatever it takes to live here.”
Newspapers are losing relevance. This is a golden opportunity for new entrants.
Filed under: internets, media | 1 Comment
Tags: ads, advertisers, banner, buying, conversion, cost, cpm, display, impression, media, news, newspapers, online, page, per, rate, relevance, revenue, search, views, web
-
Recent Comments
Castrated Yuppie on Illegal taxis suck, but they… What4 on More proof that Microsoft hate… WTF on More proof that Microsoft hate… Roy Osaki on Satellite TV: How did it … SFMTA CEO Nat Ford L… on Muni Chief Nat Ford on KQED… -
Top Posts
- Making a complex customized Django form template? Remember to include form.non_field_errors!
- More proof that Microsoft hates Apple: Office on Mac OS X sucks.
- How much is a San Francisco taxi medallion worth?
- Illegal taxis suck, but they're a symptom of insufficient supply, not lax enforcement.
- When should public transportation systems be private?
- GTA vs. Real Life: Taxi Driving
- Satellite TV: How did it start?
- Cab driving: earnings update
Tags
ads bus busses cab cabbie california city demand driving earnings econ economics fee gate graveyard increase local lrt macro media micro muni municipal night npr online pedestrian planning policy politics pricing public radio rail regulation san francisco sf shift taxi taxicab traffic transit transport transportation work
I actually had a conversation about this topic over the weekend. I’ll have to take a look at the material provided, but it looks quite thorough and interesting. We should chat about it later.