<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hey, SFMTA, please double residential parking fees and introduce traffic congestion fees.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kfarr.com/2008/03/19/hey-sfmta-increase-residential-parking-fees-and-vehicle-congestion-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kfarr.com/2008/03/19/hey-sfmta-increase-residential-parking-fees-and-vehicle-congestion-fees/</link>
	<description>Kieran Farr</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:42:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://kfarr.com/2008/03/19/hey-sfmta-increase-residential-parking-fees-and-vehicle-congestion-fees/#comment-1978</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kfarr.wordpress.com/?p=274#comment-1978</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t compare residential parking permits to private parking spaces. The permits don&#039;t guarantee you a parking spot compared to the private parking space. It&#039;s public parking on a first come first serve.

Congestion pricing won&#039;t work unless they provide free public transit downtown and increase reliability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t compare residential parking permits to private parking spaces. The permits don&#8217;t guarantee you a parking spot compared to the private parking space. It&#8217;s public parking on a first come first serve.</p>
<p>Congestion pricing won&#8217;t work unless they provide free public transit downtown and increase reliability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kfarr</title>
		<link>http://kfarr.com/2008/03/19/hey-sfmta-increase-residential-parking-fees-and-vehicle-congestion-fees/#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>kfarr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kfarr.wordpress.com/?p=274#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>@Razzu:

Nice piece! The article did a nice job of showing the breakdown of leadership on the panel.

Despite the panel&#039;s slow disintegration, I believe there is fundamental good news here: Muni operating cost increases (led in large part by labor, energy and capital improvements) dictate faster parking and congestion fee increases which have great external benefits.

Even though leadership isn&#039;t so strong to increase fees, SFMTA has to do something to cover Muni&#039;s rising costs. Thanks to the genius of the SFMTA combination of Muni/DPT, they can squeeze more revenue from DPT to pay for Muni.

So in a perverse way, increased energy costs are indirectly forcing the City to implement parking fee and congestion fees much more quickly than if left to their own impotent Blue Ribbon panels.

This is great news! Let&#039;s hope energy prices continue to rise so the City has no choice but raise parking fees to market rates and implement congestion pricing immediately.

Of course, let&#039;s pray that these proper fee adjustments coincide with proper Muni evolution such as fast and smoothly running Geary and Van Ness BRT lines so our City has a usable transit system. Don&#039;t mess this up, Mr. Ford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Razzu:</p>
<p>Nice piece! The article did a nice job of showing the breakdown of leadership on the panel.</p>
<p>Despite the panel&#8217;s slow disintegration, I believe there is fundamental good news here: Muni operating cost increases (led in large part by labor, energy and capital improvements) dictate faster parking and congestion fee increases which have great external benefits.</p>
<p>Even though leadership isn&#8217;t so strong to increase fees, SFMTA has to do something to cover Muni&#8217;s rising costs. Thanks to the genius of the SFMTA combination of Muni/DPT, they can squeeze more revenue from DPT to pay for Muni.</p>
<p>So in a perverse way, increased energy costs are indirectly forcing the City to implement parking fee and congestion fees much more quickly than if left to their own impotent Blue Ribbon panels.</p>
<p>This is great news! Let&#8217;s hope energy prices continue to rise so the City has no choice but raise parking fees to market rates and implement congestion pricing immediately.</p>
<p>Of course, let&#8217;s pray that these proper fee adjustments coincide with proper Muni evolution such as fast and smoothly running Geary and Van Ness BRT lines so our City has a usable transit system. Don&#8217;t mess this up, Mr. Ford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rzu</title>
		<link>http://kfarr.com/2008/03/19/hey-sfmta-increase-residential-parking-fees-and-vehicle-congestion-fees/#comment-1607</link>
		<dc:creator>rzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kfarr.wordpress.com/?p=274#comment-1607</guid>
		<description>Looking to parking and congestion fees to fund transit is a great idea. Unfortunately, there isn&#039;t much leadership coming from the Mayor or the MTA. Check my piece in Beyond Chron: http://quartz.he.net/~beyondch/news/index.php?itemid=5458</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking to parking and congestion fees to fund transit is a great idea. Unfortunately, there isn&#8217;t much leadership coming from the Mayor or the MTA. Check my piece in Beyond Chron: <a href="http://quartz.he.net/~beyondch/news/index.php?itemid=5458" rel="nofollow">http://quartz.he.net/~beyondch/news/index.php?itemid=5458</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
